Per Cederberg
2009-11-28 22:18:38 UTC
I just tried to modify MochiKit.Base.evalJSON() to use the new
JSON.parse() function when available. This would give us the following
advantages:
1. Speed (but, well... eval() is probably fast enough already)
2. Security
Unfortunately we would also get a nasty regression issue due to the
stricter syntax enforcement in JSON.parse() vs. eval(). It seems that
at least the Firefox parser doesn't accept constructs like these:
{ a: 1 }
since the correct JSON syntax would be:
{ "a": 1 }
Hmm... So what to do? Just skip this altogether? And add a note in the
docs that people should use JSON.parse() themselves if worried about
security or speed?
Any thoughts are welcome.
Cheers,
/Per
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group.
To post to this group, send email to ***@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mochikit+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en.
JSON.parse() function when available. This would give us the following
advantages:
1. Speed (but, well... eval() is probably fast enough already)
2. Security
Unfortunately we would also get a nasty regression issue due to the
stricter syntax enforcement in JSON.parse() vs. eval(). It seems that
at least the Firefox parser doesn't accept constructs like these:
{ a: 1 }
since the correct JSON syntax would be:
{ "a": 1 }
Hmm... So what to do? Just skip this altogether? And add a note in the
docs that people should use JSON.parse() themselves if worried about
security or speed?
Any thoughts are welcome.
Cheers,
/Per
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group.
To post to this group, send email to ***@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mochikit+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en.